忍者ブログ

時代を見通す日本の基礎情報

日本を取り巻くアジア情勢の変化 世界の情報を辛口で伝える情報部ログ 世の中はめまぐるしくかわっていきます その中で取り残されない為の情報をお伝えします Changing Asian situation surrounding Japan Tell the world information by information Department log The world is rapidly mood In order not to lag behind in its informed the <a href="https://px.a8.net/svt/ejp?a8mat=3BDZ68+72TSYA+4IRQ+5YJRM" rel="nofollow">なんでもまとめてお売りください！宅配買取「いーあきんど」</a> <img border="0" width="1" height="1" src="https://www19.a8.net/0.gif?a8mat=3BDZ68+72TSYA+4IRQ+5YJRM" alt="">

KoreaWartime commandeering compensation public opinion work

I invited the lawyer who acted as the agent of the plaintiff corps under the theme of process and a prospect of the commandeering suit to the wartime mobilized in Seoul for the rule era of the Korean Peninsula in Japan, and, in the end of September, a lecture was opened.
If "a plaintiff cannot win in such a suit, there is not the meaning that Korea became independent
Lawyer of a plaintiff agent invited as a lecturer, che.ponte  finished speaking in this way. There is a reason so that a plaintiff has confidence toward the whereabouts of the trial
Korea, the Supreme Court showed a judgment not to become extinct in the personal right to claim of the former commandeering worker of Nippon Steel Sumikin (former Japan iron manufacture) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries for the first time in last May, and four similar suit was started by Seoul, both High Court of Pusan since I sent it back. High Court judgment to give the company side an order for compensation in succession in this July is given, and a flow of the plaintiff winning the case is settling.
I gave Nippon Steel Sumikin an order for the compensation for damages payment to four former commandeering workers by the Seoul High Court judgment of July 10. The amount of compensation per plaintiff 100 million won (9,200,000 yen) of the request full amount. I recognized it until the temporary execution of the seizure of the assets which Nippon Steel Sumikin held in Korea. But when I carried out the seizure to the assets of the Japanese company residing in Korea, or che was called into question, I stated, "but it should not miss it on the thought of the plaintiff" and showed the thought that promoted that the company side paid an indemnification voluntarily. Why is it that a plaintiff corps indicating the confidence is careful about seizure in the court?
This is because it does not come to get national sympathy" (in Korea)
The supporter of the former commandeering worker exposes a fret, and the different supporter hits it on the Korean government.
Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and countryman group form an encircling net to Japan by the issue of charity dame". But the Korean government is not going to hardly move about the former commandeering worker
The Korean government establishes public-private joint committee about Japan-Korea right to claim such as the issue of former commandeering worker in August, 2005. The compensation right to claim such as "charity dames" gathered up the opinion "that an individual property right, money of solution of the damage compensation issue of the forced mobilization were included" in for free economic cooperation of 300 million dollars that the Japan side contributed in one not to be included in a Japan-Korea right to claim agreement of 1965. It is considered that it is difficult to change this situation in future. Korean government sources with "judicial decision is beyond a conventional viewpoint of the Korean government perplexity" let burn.
Therefore the plaintiff corps is going to rouse public opinion. It is the Japanese legal circles and media to become "the target". It "aims at Japan to create the mood that it should repair it", and Japan says (person concerned with plaintiff corps).

It is a collaborative relationship with the Japan Federation of Bar Associations (the Japan Federation of Bar Associations) that Korean plaintiff legal counsel makes much of in particular. In late years the Japan Federation of Bar Associations concentrates power on "a joint action for relief of human rights violations in war and the colonial rule".
The Japan Federation of Bar Associations held a Korean side and a joint seminar in Diet member Hall of Seoul on August 30. Japan Federation of Bar Associations's chairperson, Kenji Yamagishi put a congratulatory address and reported the survey that the lawyer who participated analyzed the present conditions of the issue of commandeering, a problem in a charity dame and the wartime.

I hold great Korea lawyer association and symposium equivalent to the Japanese Japan Federation of Bar Associations in Seoul and Tokyo in 2010. I gave "a joint declaration" of the Japan-Korea two countries Bar Association and joint announced "declaration about the final solution to Japanese military "charity dame" problem".
The person concerned with plaintiff corps talks.
I was conscientious" and "got a clue to approach power in Japan including the Japanese citizen's group by having fixed the preparation for joint struggle with the Japan Federation of Bar Associations"
In addition, association of great Korea lawyer gathered the Japan media which resided in Seoul from judgment of the Seoul High Court of July six days later and opened the round-table conference. I place it with "a meeting to grope for solution to issue of emperor victim together on a day, and to call for an active article publication" in the association. When I was active and reported the association, and "the reporter from speech of 15 to 21 from speech participated (Japan), and the article about the round-table conference was placed in the editorials of the next day," I emphasized significance. The plaintiff pushes forward the making of public opinion in Japan and Korea, and it is said that I want to pressure both Japan-Korea government. An aspect is different from the charity dame problem used in "Japan discount" that the commandeering suit diminishes Japanese international dignity in the wartime and raises a position of Korea, but it may be said that it is the same at the point where it is said to enlarge a situation by "from Japan".

The Korean government lets a careful posture change completely sometime soon and may request to press the Japanese Government for compensation payment"
It is the future development that Japanese diplomatic sources feel uneasy about. (honorific title abbreviation) the = Part 6 end

The suit that it was commandeered by wartime 16-18 age of the Showa era, and the severe duty that was different from the original explanation in Osaka ironworks of the former Japan iron manufacture was forced to, and four Korean men of former worker of 80-90 generations over Japan demanded compensation for damages and payment of the back pay from from the Korean Peninsula. In this March, eight men of the different former commandeering mechanic raise a suit for the compensation to the company newly in the Seoul center district court.

拍手[0回]

PR