忍者ブログ

時代を見通す日本の基礎情報

日本を取り巻くアジア情勢の変化 世界の情報を辛口で伝える情報部ログ 世の中はめまぐるしくかわっていきます その中で取り残されない為の情報をお伝えします Changing Asian situation surrounding Japan Tell the world information by information Department log The world is rapidly mood In order not to lag behind in its informed the <a href="https://px.a8.net/svt/ejp?a8mat=3BDZ68+72TSYA+4IRQ+5YJRM" rel="nofollow">なんでもまとめてお売りください!宅配買取「いーあきんど」</a> <img border="0" width="1" height="1" src="https://www19.a8.net/0.gif?a8mat=3BDZ68+72TSYA+4IRQ+5YJRM" alt="">

"Gene disturbance of the soup stock", weakening correspondence of the Matsue-shi Board of Education overwhelmed by a leftist desegregation busing

"Gene disturbance of the soup stock", weakening correspondence of the Matsue-shi Board of Education overwhelmed by a leftist desegregation busing

.ecause city Board of Education withdrew reading restrictions by the reason of " the defect of the procedure " plainly , as for the disturbance that the Matsue-shi Board of Education pursued comics reading restrictions of " the gene of the bare foot " in the elementary and junior high school in the city , a curtain became discounted .
However , it was hardly argued about the violent description and historical issue of the work which a pro and con welled up in in the process of the flip flop .

I bend it in " injustice  criticism " not to close its eyes from the past history " , and to be able to receive with the  left wing mark which children know " , and some says that I doubt weakening and the correspondence of the city Board of Education where it was , and the source of the disturbance is smoldering .

A curtain pull is deep and does not argue plainly
The temporary Board of Education meeting of the Matsue-shi Board of Education open on August 26. Approximately 40 citizens flocked to the seat for the public and were wrapped in strange heat.
All five people of the member of the board of education attend on that day. It should have been talked about whether I justified reading restrictions of "the gene of the bare foot" which city Board of Education decided, or it was said that it was bad. But criticism concentrated on the procedure that decided the measures of reading restrictions only at the city Board of Education secretariat, "you should report it to a member of the board of education meeting (as for the request of reading restrictions), it should have been originally entrusted to a school" by the committee.
"There was the radical description, but was not to influence an overall story" and, in the meeting, was done about a reason and violence description in the work which I did that the secretariat called for reading restrictions. In addition, "did it with non-adoption (as for the petition) in a municipal assembly, and an opinion not to be necessary to do appeared in the problem some other time" about the point called the mistake of the history recognition including Kimigayo criticism insisted on by the petition from a citizen, and shoved it; finished discussion without being argued.
Saying that, about the request of reading restrictions of "the gene of the bare foot", there were the defects of the procedure after all; it "is proper to return to a state before calling for a limit". The later handling decides to respect the independence of the school unanimously. The contents side of the work or educational problems were not talked about, and reading restrictions were withdrawn plainly.
The professor emeritus at Tomio Naito, Shimane University of the education chairperson who interviewed after a meeting explained it in this way.
Because "I am no good in the reason that called for reading restrictions, the history recognition is not an object of the arguments". Because I agreed in an opinion, "there is" the radical description, it is big and does not argue
After collecting data on the person concerned, it is thought that a certain calculation worked on the back for the first time in the correspondence that is such a ladle (scoop) ruler. In other words it is inevitable to take time before it is concluded if I step into the history recognition of the work. Still the criticism of the world becomes strong when I let an argument prolong. Therefore I catch only one point of the defect of the procedure and am to have planned an early end.
However, the voice of the question is finished when "an important thing is not discussed" for such correspondence.
"The reading restrictions negotiations plan"
It was that a petition for the removal from the elementary and junior high school library of "the gene of the bare foot" was submitted to the municipal assembly in last August in the beginning of this disturbance by the man in the city.
The man is a petition; "an insult for His Majesty the Emperor, the wrong interpretation for the national anthem, the barbaric act that there is not of Japan are placed". I insist, I inoculate children of Matsue-shi with wrong history recognition. I right assumed the history recognition of the work a problem.
When "an assembly should not judge the right or wrong of putting it in the reading room (with a book) based on discussion in education public welfare Committee for this in December of the year," the municipal assembly assumed a petition non-adoption.
However, I touched the order, "you should do appropriate measures by the judgment of the city Board of Education" about the violence description such as the sexual assaults to a woman while I evaluated "the gene of the bare foot" as the teaching materials of the peaceful learning in the committee.
Therefore city Board of Education succeeded discussion, but the former Japan forces cut the stomach of the pregnant woman, and it dragged a baby of the inside to have done with a problem in particular by violence description and was the scene which hit a captive neck tied up in the at the back in a saber.
The Yasutoku Furukawa vice-superintendent of education "is the document which is indispensable to peaceful learning, but the child is in the violence scenes in response to a surplus". I explain, a teacher reads together, and educational consideration made a decision that it is necessary. "There were two opinions whether "you why don't show a child freely" that "did not have to remove it" in the assembly". I confide, the reading restrictions were the compromises (the meaning that they cannot look freely, but can read with teachers).
The city Board of Education secretariat decided to introduce a reading restrictions request of "the gene of the bare foot" into the school side in this way. I tell you, a certain city Board of Education official "did not think that it is made a fuss like this" (at this point in time).
This time in sequence to the open shelf
Advanced saying that the approval of the member of the board of education was not the necessary important matter without consulting with Board of Education meeting, and the city Board of Education notified each principal about the request of reading restrictions in principal society of the elementary and junior high school on December 17, last year

"It is superior as the teaching materials of the peace education, but, as well as a child, wants you to look with a teacher". City Board of Education says that it was a request not instructions about notification to the last. However, there was the consultation, "how to receive principals was various, and a librarian was puzzled" from a school librarian and called again in principal society of this January. According to the questionnaire of city Board of Education, it is said that I took the reading limit measures that 42 of 43 schools possessing "the gene of the bare foot" by this request move to the library.
When "I recognize the last judgment to be a school (reading restrictions) and was a request to the last," city Board of Education explains it, but the voice "that I took with instructions not a request" is asked by many principals, and "the gene of the bare foot" will disappear from the library of most schools after all.
And reverse is taking place in this disturbance really. City Board of Education holds principal society of a temporary elementary and junior high school to convey the request withdrawal of reading restrictions via the opening temporary Board of Education meeting on August 28, this year. When I apologized when "I caused you worry, and the Nobuo Shimizu superintendent of education wanted to be very sorry" and "wanted you to decide it to hear campus and a protector, a local opinion (by the correspondence that you included by all means of reading restrictions)," I conveyed a policy to entrust the correspondence about handling of "the gene of the bare foot" to a judgment of the school side. I receive this, and each school makes "a gene" the open shelf in sequence.
Anyway, the disturbance watched a tentative end,; but this; be practical, and how is the lack. A series of correspondence of city Board of Education does not have a resolute place at all. Even if criticism tinged with the inclinations to the left for reading restrictions is a problem very much, I am overwhelmed by it and withdraw a limit, and it is a problem "I leave all" "a judgment to each school by expression called entrusting it", and to have done the responsibility. The way of speaking called "the request gives an original impression of the buck-passing not instructions".
This problem caused halation including a way of weakening of such city Board of Education in various quarters. Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Hirofumi Shimomura stated, "it was not what Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology taught it to in what city Board of Education judged" about the withdrawal of reading restrictions at a press conference of August 27 and ate a question when "I thought how about what I left to the judgment of the school for me" while showing a thought to respect a judgment.
The Mayor of Toru Hashimoto Osaka of the meeting Gesamtvertretung of the revolution to lay emphasis on an educational issue in Japan pointed out the Asahi Shimbun, the Mainichi Shimbun which demanded withdrawal editorially, "the media makes noise and added pressure" to mind, and "the city Board of Education is slovenly". I criticized it when I virtually abandoned independency by oneself.
"It is the gene which the measures of the open shelf had stolen again," but the argument about history recognition or the violence description remains leaving behind. There is no help for it after all even if I did ignoring a problem with not being settled, and city Board of Education, this correspondence of Matsue-shi including the municipal assembly have anything stolen

拍手[0回]

PR

I bend it in " injustice  criticism " not to close its eyes from the past history " , and to be able to receive with the  left wing mark which children know " , and some says that I doubt weakening and the correspondence of the city Board of Education where it was , and the source of the disturbance is smoldering .

A curtain pull is deep and does not argue plainly
The temporary Board of Education meeting of the Matsue-shi Board of Education open on August 26. Approximately 40 citizens flocked to the seat for the public and were wrapped in strange heat.
All five people of the member of the board of education attend on that day. It should have been talked about whether I justified reading restrictions of "the gene of the bare foot" which city Board of Education decided, or it was said that it was bad. But criticism concentrated on the procedure that decided the measures of reading restrictions only at the city Board of Education secretariat, "you should report it to a member of the board of education meeting (as for the request of reading restrictions), it should have been originally entrusted to a school" by the committee.
"There was the radical description, but was not to influence an overall story" and, in the meeting, was done about a reason and violence description in the work which I did that the secretariat called for reading restrictions. In addition, "did it with non-adoption (as for the petition) in a municipal assembly, and an opinion not to be necessary to do appeared in the problem some other time" about the point called the mistake of the history recognition including Kimigayo criticism insisted on by the petition from a citizen, and shoved it; finished discussion without being argued.
Saying that, about the request of reading restrictions of "the gene of the bare foot", there were the defects of the procedure after all; it "is proper to return to a state before calling for a limit". The later handling decides to respect the independence of the school unanimously. The contents side of the work or educational problems were not talked about, and reading restrictions were withdrawn plainly.
The professor emeritus at Tomio Naito, Shimane University of the education chairperson who interviewed after a meeting explained it in this way.
Because "I am no good in the reason that called for reading restrictions, the history recognition is not an object of the arguments". Because I agreed in an opinion, "there is" the radical description, it is big and does not argue
After collecting data on the person concerned, it is thought that a certain calculation worked on the back for the first time in the correspondence that is such a ladle (scoop) ruler. In other words it is inevitable to take time before it is concluded if I step into the history recognition of the work. Still the criticism of the world becomes strong when I let an argument prolong. Therefore I catch only one point of the defect of the procedure and am to have planned an early end.
However, the voice of the question is finished when "an important thing is not discussed" for such correspondence.
"The reading restrictions negotiations plan"
It was that a petition for the removal from the elementary and junior high school library of "the gene of the bare foot" was submitted to the municipal assembly in last August in the beginning of this disturbance by the man in the city.
The man is a petition; "an insult for His Majesty the Emperor, the wrong interpretation for the national anthem, the barbaric act that there is not of Japan are placed". I insist, I inoculate children of Matsue-shi with wrong history recognition. I right assumed the history recognition of the work a problem.
When "an assembly should not judge the right or wrong of putting it in the reading room (with a book) based on discussion in education public welfare Committee for this in December of the year," the municipal assembly assumed a petition non-adoption.
However, I touched the order, "you should do appropriate measures by the judgment of the city Board of Education" about the violence description such as the sexual assaults to a woman while I evaluated "the gene of the bare foot" as the teaching materials of the peaceful learning in the committee.
Therefore city Board of Education succeeded discussion, but the former Japan forces cut the stomach of the pregnant woman, and it dragged a baby of the inside to have done with a problem in particular by violence description and was the scene which hit a captive neck tied up in the at the back in a saber.
The Yasutoku Furukawa vice-superintendent of education "is the document which is indispensable to peaceful learning, but the child is in the violence scenes in response to a surplus". I explain, a teacher reads together, and educational consideration made a decision that it is necessary. "There were two opinions whether "you why don't show a child freely" that "did not have to remove it" in the assembly". I confide, the reading restrictions were the compromises (the meaning that they cannot look freely, but can read with teachers).
The city Board of Education secretariat decided to introduce a reading restrictions request of "the gene of the bare foot" into the school side in this way. I tell you, a certain city Board of Education official "did not think that it is made a fuss like this" (at this point in time).
This time in sequence to the open shelf
Advanced saying that the approval of the member of the board of education was not the necessary important matter without consulting with Board of Education meeting, and the city Board of Education notified each principal about the request of reading restrictions in principal society of the elementary and junior high school on December 17, last year

"It is superior as the teaching materials of the peace education, but, as well as a child, wants you to look with a teacher". City Board of Education says that it was a request not instructions about notification to the last. However, there was the consultation, "how to receive principals was various, and a librarian was puzzled" from a school librarian and called again in principal society of this January. According to the questionnaire of city Board of Education, it is said that I took the reading limit measures that 42 of 43 schools possessing "the gene of the bare foot" by this request move to the library.
When "I recognize the last judgment to be a school (reading restrictions) and was a request to the last," city Board of Education explains it, but the voice "that I took with instructions not a request" is asked by many principals, and "the gene of the bare foot" will disappear from the library of most schools after all.
And reverse is taking place in this disturbance really. City Board of Education holds principal society of a temporary elementary and junior high school to convey the request withdrawal of reading restrictions via the opening temporary Board of Education meeting on August 28, this year. When I apologized when "I caused you worry, and the Nobuo Shimizu superintendent of education wanted to be very sorry" and "wanted you to decide it to hear campus and a protector, a local opinion (by the correspondence that you included by all means of reading restrictions)," I conveyed a policy to entrust the correspondence about handling of "the gene of the bare foot" to a judgment of the school side. I receive this, and each school makes "a gene" the open shelf in sequence.
Anyway, the disturbance watched a tentative end,; but this; be practical, and how is the lack. A series of correspondence of city Board of Education does not have a resolute place at all. Even if criticism tinged with the inclinations to the left for reading restrictions is a problem very much, I am overwhelmed by it and withdraw a limit, and it is a problem "I leave all" "a judgment to each school by expression called entrusting it", and to have done the responsibility. The way of speaking called "the request gives an original impression of the buck-passing not instructions".
This problem caused halation including a way of weakening of such city Board of Education in various quarters. Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Hirofumi Shimomura stated, "it was not what Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology taught it to in what city Board of Education judged" about the withdrawal of reading restrictions at a press conference of August 27 and ate a question when "I thought how about what I left to the judgment of the school for me" while showing a thought to respect a judgment.
The Mayor of Toru Hashimoto Osaka of the meeting Gesamtvertretung of the revolution to lay emphasis on an educational issue in Japan pointed out the Asahi Shimbun, the Mainichi Shimbun which demanded withdrawal editorially, "the media makes noise and added pressure" to mind, and "the city Board of Education is slovenly". I criticized it when I virtually abandoned independency by oneself.
"It is the gene which the measures of the open shelf had stolen again," but the argument about history recognition or the violence description remains leaving behind. There is no help for it after all even if I did ignoring a problem with not being settled, and city Board of Education, this correspondence of Matsue-shi including the municipal assembly have anything stolen

拍手[0回]

PR
" dc:identifier="http://zero.indiesj.com/%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B9/-gene%20disturbance%20of%20the%20s" /> -->